{"id":2255,"date":"2017-07-03T13:10:40","date_gmt":"2017-07-03T20:10:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=2255"},"modified":"2017-07-03T13:10:40","modified_gmt":"2017-07-03T20:10:40","slug":"the-european-plan-to-reset-records","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=2255","title":{"rendered":"The European Plan to Reset Records"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Me<\/a>There has been a suggestion from European Athletics to reset the track and field record book to only allow records that conform to the sport’s current standard of taking and storing blood and urine so that either or both can be tested post record for new drugs and methods of doping discovered after the record has been ratified. This would effectively eliminate any and all records set before 2005!<\/p>\n

While I understand the frustration of the many doping scandals that have rocked the sport in recent years. The proposal set forth by European Athletics does not fix the core issue – which frankly has been the lax, and often complicit, attitude of the sport’s governing body towards eradicating doping in the sport. And instead focuses misplaced anger and punishment on innocent athletes. As such, this proposal should be completely discarded. While it "could" eliminate "some" records that many of us know in our heart of hearts are illegitimate, it "most certainly" will get rid of, and punish, innocent athletes and records! We’re talking about throwing out the baby with the bath water when only the water is dirty! The sport cannot do this and maintain any sense of legitimacy as a sport. To follow this line of logic would be an abject travesty!<\/p>\n

Do I question records from the Eastern Bloc that have existed since the eighties when we know from their own records that doping was prevalent? Absolutely! But why can’t we simply create a rule stating that admission of doping of any kind – in this case the discovery of written records – will result in immediate removal of records from the books?<\/p>\n

Do I question the 100 meter record set by FloJo in Indianapolis in 1988? Yes I do. If for no other reason than the fact that on a day when everything else was windy it was the ONLY event that mysteriously registered a 0.0 wind! That logic alone should render that particular mark moot – and should’ve at the time. <\/p>\n

My point here is simple, if we truly take a look at the record book, we can create "legitimate" rules to eliminate the obvious discrepancies that exist.<\/em><\/strong> <\/p>\n

Because while I would love to see the obvious removed, I refuse to go on the attack against athletes like Jonathon Edwards, Mike Powell, Hicham ElGuerrouj, Javier Sotomayor, and Paula Radcliffe among others. And we’re not just talking about the records but the all time lists, because if, for example, you remove Kevin Young as WR holder in the 400H you can’t replace him with Edwin Moses, Bryon Bronson, Samuel Matete, Andre Phillips, or Amadou dia Ba! How freaking ridiculous is THAT?<\/p>\n

The European solution is lazy and misguided. It’s an attempt to be pious and politically correct. IF we’re going to clean up the record book, we need to take a scalpel to it, not a meat cleaver. We KNOW what the problems are. The solution I vocalized above would remedy most of them! Because the real issue is the fact that most women’s records are out of reach due to the rampant doping of women during the 80’s and 90’s. Let’s fix THAT. <\/p>\n

And let’s start putting pressure on the leadership of the IAAF. Jamaica went YEARS without an anti doping agency or even legitimate testing facilities – with the blessing of the IAAF. We read that Lord Coe’s office was aware of what was taking place in Russia and discussed a cover up. Kenya’s testing issues have been known for years. These are but a few of the well known issues regarding testing that have not been dealt with properly by the IAAF. That as much as anything is a problem historically when looking at the potential impact on the record book. <\/p>\n

The bottom line is this. There are better ways to "fix" the record book. The IAAF, instead of taking this ridiculous proposal and implementing it, needs to form a commission to explore more strategic ways (see above) to bring the record book into better conformity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There has been a suggestion from European Athletics to reset the track and field record book to only allow records that conform to the sport’s current standard of taking and storing blood and urine so that either or both can be tested post record for new drugs and methods of doping discovered after the record has been ratified. This would effectively eliminate any and all records set before 2005! While I understand the frustration of the many doping scandals that have rocked the sport in recent years. The proposal set forth by European Athletics does not fix the core issue – which frankly has been the lax, and often complicit, attitude of the sport’s governing body towards eradicating doping in the sport. And instead focuses misplaced anger and punishment on innocent athletes. As such, this proposal should be completely discarded. While it "could" eliminate "some" records that many of us know in our heart of hearts are illegitimate, it "most certainly" will get rid of, and punish, innocent athletes and records! We’re talking about throwing out the baby with the bath water when only the water is dirty! The sport cannot do this and maintain any sense of legitimacy as a sport. To follow this line of logic would be an abject travesty! Do I question records from the Eastern Bloc that have existed since the eighties when we know from their own records that doping was prevalent? Absolutely! But why can’t we simply create a rule stating that admission of doping of any kind – in this case the discovery of written records – will result in immediate removal of records from the books? Do I question the 100 meter record set by FloJo in Indianapolis in 1988? Yes I do. If for no other reason than the fact that on a day when everything else was windy it was the ONLY event that mysteriously registered a 0.0 wind! That logic alone should render that particular mark moot – and should’ve at the time. My point here is simple, if we truly take a look at the record book, we can create "legitimate" rules to eliminate the obvious discrepancies that exist.  Because while I would love to see the obvious removed, I refuse to go on the attack against athletes like Jonathon Edwards, Mike Powell, Hicham ElGuerrouj, Javier Sotomayor, and Paula Radcliffe among others. And we’re not just talking about the records but the all time lists, because if, for example, you remove Kevin Young as WR holder in the 400H you can’t replace him with Edwin Moses, Bryon Bronson, Samuel Matete, Andre Phillips, or Amadou dia Ba! How freaking ridiculous is THAT? The European solution is lazy and misguided. It’s an attempt to be pious and politically correct. IF we’re going to clean up the record book, we need to take a scalpel to it, not a meat cleaver. We KNOW what the problems are. The solution I vocalized above would remedy most of them! Because the real issue is the fact that most women’s records are out of reach due to the rampant doping of women during the 80’s and 90’s. Let’s fix THAT. And let’s start putting pressure on the leadership of the IAAF. Jamaica went YEARS without an anti doping agency or even legitimate testing facilities – with the blessing of the IAAF. We read that Lord Coe’s office was aware of what was taking place in Russia and discussed a cover up. Kenya’s testing issues have been known for years. These are but a few of the well known issues regarding testing that have not been dealt with properly by the IAAF. That as much as anything is a problem historically when looking at the potential impact on the record book. The bottom line is this. There are better ways to "fix" the record book. The IAAF, instead of taking this ridiculous proposal and implementing it, needs to form a commission to explore more strategic ways (see above) to bring the record book into better conformity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[503,532],"class_list":["post-2255","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-iaaf","tag-records"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pa3DCY-An","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":372,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=372","url_meta":{"origin":2255,"position":0},"title":"Verena Sailer wins Euro 100 \u2013 It\u2019s Been a Long Time Coming for Germany","author":"CHill","date":"July 30, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Yesterday Germany's Verena Sailer won the women\u2019s 100 meter title in a PR 11.10. Not big headline news when you consider that seven women have run under 11.00 so far this season, and four of them have run under 10.90! Makes Sailer\u2019s win seem rather pedestrian in comparison. But when\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=372#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"July 30, 2010 - 06244895 date 29 07 2010 Copyright imago Kolvenbach 29 7 2010 Athletics European Championships in Barcelona Spain Verena Sailer ger 100m cheering 29 7 2010 European Athletics Championships in Barcelona Spain Verena Sailer ger 100m Kolvenbach Athletics euro Barcelona women Single Vdig 2010 vertical Highlight premiumd Athletics European Championship.","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/view.picapp.com\/pictures.photo\/image\/9453217\/sports-news-july-2010\/sports-news-july-2010.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2109,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=2109","url_meta":{"origin":2255,"position":1},"title":"World Records and the State of the Sport","author":"CHill","date":"January 18, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"British Track and Field has released a manifesto on the status of the sport - changes it feels are necessary to \"clean up\" the sport of track and field. Among these is the matter of the sports records and what it sees as a full scale revision of track and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"IAAF\"","block_context":{"text":"IAAF","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?tag=iaaf"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sprinter Shadow","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/trackchill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Sprinter-Shadow_thumb.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":261,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=261","url_meta":{"origin":2255,"position":2},"title":"The Unbreakables","author":"CHill","date":"January 6, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"As we close out this decade and move into the next, the most excitement the sport has coming out of the \"oughts\" has been the record breaking exploits of Usain Bolt, and the altering of the 100 and 200 meter sprint lists by Bolt and Tyson Gay. During the decade\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"Silke Gladisch, Marita Koch, Marlies Gohr and Auerswald of the East Germany","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cdn.picapp.com\/ftp\/Images\/3\/7\/1\/1\/Silke_Gladisch_Marita_17fc.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":256,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=256","url_meta":{"origin":2255,"position":3},"title":"Defining the Decade","author":"CHill","date":"December 22, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"I've seen many \"end of the decade\" articles out there, but they all seem to have forgotten how many years are in a decade - blinded by the bright lights of the lightning Bolt's past two seasons. As spectacular as he has been there was much that took place between\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"IAAF Golden league","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/cdn.picapp.com\/ftp\/Images\/e\/2\/f\/d\/IAAF_Golden_league_4479.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2764,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=2764","url_meta":{"origin":2255,"position":4},"title":"World Athletics and the Athlete of the Year","author":"CHill","date":"December 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"It's the end of the year and that time we call, awards time. Nothing out of the ordinary, as we've been doing this for decades. Choosing the Best of the Year in a myriad of topics, including sports, entertainment, books and other subjects. It's basically a celebration of the many\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/trackchill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/IMG_1950-150x150.jpeg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2749,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=2749","url_meta":{"origin":2255,"position":5},"title":"Men’s 100m Outlook, 2024","author":"CHill","date":"October 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The annual post season \"break\" is almost over. That period of time after the final meet of the year when elite athletes go on vacations, rest, and recharge their batteries. Anywhere from a few weeks for some, to a couple of months for others. Recovery from the wars of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Bracy\"","block_context":{"text":"Bracy","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?tag=bracy"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/trackchill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/6B8E235B-830F-4861-93D3-7B66B5A82440-150x150.jpeg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2255","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2255"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2255\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2256,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2255\/revisions\/2256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2255"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2255"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2255"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}