{"id":520,"date":"2011-06-30T11:02:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-30T18:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=520"},"modified":"2011-06-30T11:02:00","modified_gmt":"2011-06-30T18:02:00","slug":"is-it-time-to-change-our-selection-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=520","title":{"rendered":"Is It Time to Change Our Selection Process?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"image\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Sanya Richards Ross just brought up an age old issue<\/a> when it comes to the U.S. Trials system \u2013 that it should be changed to ensure we send our best to major competitions. <\/p>\n

In some ways the sport has already been in agreement. After all, the IAAF went to the bye for World champions because of Michael Johnson\u2019s injury status in 1997. Johnson was injured and unable to compete in our selection meet for the World Championships, and to ensure his competition the IAAF created the bye for World champions that allowed Johnson to compete in Athens. Since then all World champions have been assured a place in the subsequent Championship immediately following their victory. <\/p>\n

So clearly there is the view within the sport, that having the best available to compete should be given priority. The problem is just how to accomplish that. The IAAF can expand the competition field to accommodate athletes with byes. USATF, however, does not have the luxury of simply adding another spot to our 100 or 200 meter rosters in order to accommodate Tyson Gay \u2013 in this case. Nor would it be equitable to allow defending champions (World or Olympic) a bye as there are only a handful of those each cycle \u2013 as opposed to the IAAF rule which covers every event. <\/p>\n

The most oft spoken solution, and the one espoused by Richards Ross, is two keep the qualifying meet as is, but only select two individuals based on finish. The third slot would be at the discretion of coaches decisions \u2013 based on form and fitness. While that sounds wonderful in principle, it has the potential to become a political nightmare \u2013 which is why discussions of this nature have never gotten very far. This would give power\/clout to the \u201cstronger\u201d coaches and training camps. <\/p>\n

I do like the idea of selecting only the first two at Trials and leaving a spot available to be filled later. One reason is what we are facing \u2013 a star athlete not ready due to injury at the time the Trials are run. I also like the idea because quite often our 3rd place at Trials is not ready to perform which leads to the spot being almost a throw away. Leaving a spot to be named later would take care of both issues. <\/p>\n

My suggestion is to leave a spot open, but to make it less political. I think you do that by making the selection objective rather than subjective. In this case award the spot to the individual not already on the team that has the best sequence of legal marks over their top three competitions with at least one of the marks having to come post Trials. This means that if an athlete\u2019s five best marks came before the Trials and number six came after, you take marks one, two and six to determine average. It also means that if the individual has no marks after the Trials they are ineligible \u2013 they have to show the ability to compete in the Major. Also in the case of field events, best mark in three separate competitions so that marks within a sequence would not count.<\/p>\n

Now there are no decisions to make. No back room deals to hammer out. You have to compete your way onto the team \u2013 this time in separate competitions. Check the numbers and the best available athlete gets the spot. If Tyson runs 9.79 and 9.83 before Trials and gets hurt and can\u2019t compete at Trials but runs 9.81 afterwards, and athlete \u201cB\u201d gets 4th at Trials but has marks of 9.85 and 9.84, then he can get the spot instead of Tyson if he can run a 9.73. In short if Tyson gets the spot it\u2019s because he\u2019s run better overall than athlete \u201cB\u201d \u2013 not because he is Tyson Gay or because B is politicked out of the spot. The spot goes to the best available athlete and you must PROVE it. If Tyson were to come back and only run 9.91, then athlete \u201cB\u201d can get the spot by running 9.83. Again the better performing athlete gets the spot. <\/p>\n

I\u2019m sure that I or others can run scenarios that may not work, but I think something of this nature keeps the \u201c\u2019system\u201d as close to the present system as possible \u2013 and that\u2019s keeping it in the hands of the athletes and away from subjective selection. What are your thoughts?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sanya Richards Ross just brought up an age old issue when it comes to the U.S. Trials system \u2013 that it should be changed to ensure we send our best to major competitions. In some ways the sport has already been in agreement. After all, the IAAF went to the bye for World champions because of Michael Johnson\u2019s injury status in 1997. Johnson was injured and unable to compete in our selection meet for the World Championships, and to ensure his competition the IAAF created the bye for World champions that allowed Johnson to compete in Athens. Since then all World champions have been assured a place in the subsequent Championship immediately following their victory. So clearly there is the view within the sport, that having the best available to compete should be given priority. The problem is just how to accomplish that. The IAAF can expand the competition field to accommodate athletes with byes. USATF, however, does not have the luxury of simply adding another spot to our 100 or 200 meter rosters in order to accommodate Tyson Gay \u2013 in this case. Nor would it be equitable to allow defending champions (World or Olympic) a bye as there are only a handful of those each cycle \u2013 as opposed to the IAAF rule which covers every event. The most oft spoken solution, and the one espoused by Richards Ross, is two keep the qualifying meet as is, but only select two individuals based on finish. The third slot would be at the discretion of coaches decisions \u2013 based on form and fitness. While that sounds wonderful in principle, it has the potential to become a political nightmare \u2013 which is why discussions of this nature have never gotten very far. This would give power\/clout to the \u201cstronger\u201d coaches and training camps. I do like the idea of selecting only the first two at Trials and leaving a spot available to be filled later. One reason is what we are facing \u2013 a star athlete not ready due to injury at the time the Trials are run. I also like the idea because quite often our 3rd place at Trials is not ready to perform which leads to the spot being almost a throw away. Leaving a spot to be named later would take care of both issues. My suggestion is to leave a spot open, but to make it less political. I think you do that by making the selection objective rather than subjective. In this case award the spot to the individual not already on the team that has the best sequence of legal marks over their top three competitions with at least one of the marks having to come post Trials. This means that if an athlete\u2019s five best marks came before the Trials and number six came after, you take marks one, two and six to determine average. It also means that if the individual has no marks after the Trials they are ineligible \u2013 they have to show the ability to compete in the Major. Also in the case of field events, best mark in three separate competitions so that marks within a sequence would not count. Now there are no decisions to make. No back room deals to hammer out. You have to compete your way onto the team \u2013 this time in separate competitions. Check the numbers and the best available athlete gets the spot. If Tyson runs 9.79 and 9.83 before Trials and gets hurt and can\u2019t compete at Trials but runs 9.81 afterwards, and athlete \u201cB\u201d gets 4th at Trials but has marks of 9.85 and 9.84, then he can get the spot instead of Tyson if he can run a 9.73. In short if Tyson gets the spot it\u2019s because he\u2019s run better overall than athlete \u201cB\u201d \u2013 not because he is Tyson Gay or because B is politicked out of the spot. The spot goes to the best available athlete and you must PROVE it. If Tyson were to come back and only run 9.91, then athlete \u201cB\u201d can get the spot by running 9.83. Again the better performing athlete gets the spot. I\u2019m sure that I or others can run scenarios that may not work, but I think something of this nature keeps the \u201c\u2019system\u201d as close to the present system as possible \u2013 and that\u2019s keeping it in the hands of the athletes and away from subjective selection. What are your thoughts?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pa3DCY-8o","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":446,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=446","url_meta":{"origin":520,"position":0},"title":"Should the Olympics Adopt the IAAF Sprint Changes?","author":"CHill","date":"February 17, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"I ask that question because over the past few days I\u2019ve read many, many complaints about sprinters receiving a \u201cbye\u201d from the first round of the Olympics \u2013 based upon the changes to be instituted at this year\u2019s World Championships in Daegu. I raise the question not because I am\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2124,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=2124","url_meta":{"origin":520,"position":1},"title":"Wow, I Agree with Carl Lewis","author":"CHill","date":"March 9, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"It's been the rare occasion that I've been in agreement with Carl Lewis. He's been \"controversial\" during much of his association with the sport of track and field going back to the 1980s. But as I read this article I found myself nodding my head in agreement. While I've been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"Anti-doping\"","block_context":{"text":"Anti-doping","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?tag=anti-doping"},"img":{"alt_text":"Me for Blog pic","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/trackchill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/Me-for-Blog-pic_thumb.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":612,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=612","url_meta":{"origin":520,"position":2},"title":"Should Distance Runners Be Given a \u201cPass\u201d in Evaluations?","author":"CHill","date":"November 17, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"I know I said I was getting back to rankings, but there is still a lot of time left before the calendar year is done, and there\u2019s an interesting debate on the floor. The debate revolves around the selection of the Female Athlete of the Year by the IAAF, as\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=612#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"image","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/lh6.ggpht.com\/-SmFRM8YJA1c\/TsWq2KwAcaI\/AAAAAAAAAlE\/SrXVL2DjuCw\/image_thumb.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":435,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=435","url_meta":{"origin":520,"position":3},"title":"Olympic Tracks Must Be Preserved","author":"CHill","date":"January 17, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"There is a\u00a0 discussion on the table as to what will happen to London\u2019s new Olympic track once the games are over. Apparently a soccer league wants to take over the facility, tear it down and rebuild it without the track \u2013 and that is drawing criticism from some corners.\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"london-2012-olympic-park-progress","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/lh6.ggpht.com\/_q69RXDGKhjE\/TTR3N_Zqu7I\/AAAAAAAAAGQ\/q4X0iEZWYFc\/london-2012-olympic-park-progress_thumb%5B1%5D.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":156,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=156","url_meta":{"origin":520,"position":4},"title":"When will we get Merritt v Wariner?","author":"CHill","date":"May 12, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"In Lashawn Merritt's recent entry on his IAAF diary he outlined his upcoming schedule:\u2022 200 this weekend at the Adidas Classic\u2022 400 at the Reebok Grand Prix\u2022 300 at the Prefontaine Classic\u2022 400 at NationalsKnowing what Merritt was running I took a look at Jeremy Wariner's website to find out\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":768,"url":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=768","url_meta":{"origin":520,"position":5},"title":"How to Create a True World Championships","author":"CHill","date":"January 13, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"I was taken aback when reading the TFN Editorial for January, as it stated that the writer saw no way that there would ever be a \u201cTrue\u201d World Championships. It seems, among other reasons given, that the thought is the various member nations would never vote for a \u201cTrue\u201d World\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"World Championships\"","block_context":{"text":"World Championships","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?tag=world-championships"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/osaka2007.iaaf.org\/MultimediaFiles\/Photo\/Competitions\/WorldChampionships\/40784_W600XH400.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/520\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}