{"id":614,"date":"2011-11-21T16:18:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-22T00:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=614"},"modified":"2011-12-29T08:36:32","modified_gmt":"2011-12-29T16:36:32","slug":"is-there-a-benefit-to-the-u-s-being-in-the-diamond-league","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/?p=614","title":{"rendered":"Is There a Benefit to the U.S. being in the Diamond League?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/lh5.ggpht.com\/-jLY727Z6wn0\/TsrqZv4Y52I\/AAAAAAAAAlc\/uFl2CxGz1VI\/s1600-h\/image%25255B5%25255D.png\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"background-image: none; margin: 8px 8px 8px 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; padding-top: 0px; border: 0px;\" title=\"image\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/lh3.ggpht.com\/-Lfpa245UI6w\/TsrqaA0kMCI\/AAAAAAAAAlk\/QDIcgk0y158\/image_thumb%25255B1%25255D.png?resize=244%2C169\" alt=\"image\" width=\"244\" height=\"169\" align=\"left\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a>I ask this question because last week the Diamond League schedule was released and once again it looks like the New York and Eugene meets received less than preferential treatment.<\/p>\n<p>First let\u2019s look at the scheduling aspect. The Prefontaine Classic (Eugene) is scheduled for June 2<sup>nd<\/sup> \u2013 two days after the Rome meet on May 31<sup>st<\/sup>. Similarly the Adidas\/New York is scheduled for Jun 9<sup>th<\/sup>\u2013 two days after Oslo\u2019s Bislett Games! It doesn\u2019t take a rocket scientist to figure out a couple of things real quickly.<\/p>\n<p>The first is that the athletes will have a very clear choice to make \u2013 to compete in Europe, or to cross the ocean and compete in the U.S. for two meets, or actually in one meet depending on your event. There is no opportunity to compete twice in Europe then come to the states, or vice versa to compete in two meets in the states then go back to Europe. One will either be in one place or the other, as the prospect of traveling back and forth across the ocean is impractical from both a financial and logistical point of view \u2013 logistics meaning the physical toll it would exact on the athletes with time changes, jet lag, etc.<\/p>\n<p>So that aspect alone will restrict attendance at both meets, because with 2012 being an Olympic year and June the month of most Olympic Trials meets, the odds are that most people will want to stay as close to home as possible in order to be as fresh as possible for Trials meets. Of course, there is another decision that is completely taken off the table for the athletes \u2013 what events they can compete in in each meet. Because as I\u2019ve lamented ad nausea, the Diamond League meets are only half meets \u2013 and the U.S. meets get the short end of the stick here as well!<\/p>\n<p>First off here are the events that will be contested in each U.S. meet:<\/p>\n<table width=\"400\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"2\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><strong>Pre<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">Men<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">200<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">400<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">800<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">1500<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">110H<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">TJ<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">DT<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">JT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">Women<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">200<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">400<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">ST<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">HJ<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">PV<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">LJ<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">DT<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<table width=\"398\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"2\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><strong>NY<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">Men<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">200<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">400<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">800<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">ST<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">110H<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">HJ<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">LJ<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">DT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">Women<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">100<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">800<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">5000<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">400H<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">PV<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">TJ<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">SP<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"44\">JT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The first thing you notice is that the star potential is taken off the table as there is no men\u2019s 100 in either meet. Given that a) the 200 is the lesser contested of the two sprints (100\/200) in any season, let alone an Olympic one, and b) with Trials meets coming up it will be less likely to see a sprinter here than in the 100, it\u2019s a fairly safe bet that seeing Bolt, Gay, Dix, Blake, et al is nearly slim to none in the U.S. No offense to any of the other star level athletes out there, but there goes a large chunk of the star quality and drawing power in this sport \u2013 no offense just fact at this point \u2013 because right now the 100 is The marquee event in the sport.<\/p>\n<p>The next thing I noticed is no men\u2019s 5000 or 10,000 in either meet \u2013 a huge negative for the Pre Classic in my opinion which has always been the country\u2019s premier distance meet. This is a meet that is named after a distance running icon, yet will not have EITHER event on the schedule \u2013 almost un-American. The historical significance aside, it also means that seeing any of the major African distance runners is virtually out of the question in the U.S. meets \u2013 a tragedy that is really on par with missing out on the world\u2019s top sprinters!<\/p>\n<p>Some might say that Pre will have the men\u2019s 1500, and I would say that you\u2019re right there \u2013 so perhaps we may get a few milers to town in Eugene. But the next noticeable slight is that neither meet will have the women\u2019s 800 or 1500 meters \u2013 two middle distance events where the U.S. has really begun to shine in the past few seasons! So not only will distance mecca Eugene be without the African distance runners \u2013 and our own Ritzenhein, Rupp, Solinsky et al, &#8211; but they will also be without \u201d home\u201d favorites Uceny, Rowbury, Wurth Thomas, Simpson, Wright, Gall, Montano and Vessey to name a few.<\/p>\n<p>Don\u2019t get me wrong, there are plenty of top level athletes out there to put in these meets. We do get the 110 hurdles which has star potential with the likes of David Oliver, Jason Richardson, Liu Xiang and Dayron Robles. We do get both the men\u2019s and women\u2019s 400 which could have LaShawn Merritt, Jeremy Wariner, Allyson Felix, and\/or Sanya Richards. But the reality is that we lose out on some serous BIG name potential off the top just from the schedule. So I have to ask: Is there any benefit to being part of the Diamond League, or were we better off when we had a strong Pre, New York and Home Depot on our schedule? For my money the answer is \u2013 yes.<\/p>\n<p>New York went from the exciting Tyson Gay v Usain Bolt meet of 2008 to the sleep fests we\u2019ve seen the past couple of years \u2013 as logistics and event scheduling as virtually killed this meet in my humble opinion. Just two years ago (year before DL) the Pre meet boasted Gelete Burka (3:59.89) barely over Jenny Simpson (3:59.90); Asbel Kiprop (3:48.50) over Haron Keitany (3:48.78) in the mile; Vivian Cheruiyot (5:31.53) over Maryam Jamal (5:31.88) in a 2000: and Bernard Lagat (7:35.92) over Saif Shaheen (7:36.87) in a 3000; in an awesome display of distance running fitting the man the meet is named after \u2013 there will be none of that this year!<\/p>\n<p>The Diamond League is proving to be an abject failure on several levels, including what it is doing to what few meets we have left here in the United States. It seems like there is little real thought going into the scheduling process \u2013 especially when it comes to creating meets in the U.S. that a) have any real appeal, and b) that make any kind of logistical sense.<\/p>\n<p>New York is but a shell of what it was becoming a few scant years ago, and if it weren\u2019t for its Nike affiliation Pre would be in the same boat. USATF needs to take a hard look at the competition schedule here in the United States, and look for ways to provide more and better opportunities for OUR athletes to be able to compete HERE at home. Because at the current rate youngsters growing up today will have no idea what a real world class meet looks like live, up close, and personal.<\/p>\n<p>The Home Depot and California Relays meets need to be resurrected and put back on the schedule. New York and Eugene need to become FULL meets again that are worthy of attracting the world\u2019s best without having to be bent and twisted to fit the Diamond League format. Because if we have any hope of regaining a place of prominence within the track and field community with respect to competitions here in the U.S. this is certainly not the way to do so. We\u2019re not just losing ground to traditional track countries like Great Britain \u2013 which now has London, Gateshead AND Birmingham on the schedule \u2013 but to upstarts like Doha, Kingston, and Daegu. Granted Jamaica is a trackc happy place and has been working towards getting a major meet on the map for a while, but Doha and Daegu? When Wallace Spearmon ran 19.65 there in \u201906 I had to Google it to see just where it was!<\/p>\n<p>I won\u2019t even begin to reel off the names of world class meets I used to frequent in this country; just suffice it to say that we are a LONG way from there. Many were excited that we got Diamond League status for New York and Eugene, but it\u2019s starting to look like another form of slow death for U.S. meets if we don\u2019t step up and do something about it. At least that\u2019s how it\u2019s starting to look to me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I ask this question because last week the Diamond League schedule was released and once again it looks like the New York and Eugene meets received less than preferential treatment. First let\u2019s look at the scheduling aspect. The Prefontaine Classic (Eugene) is scheduled for June 2nd \u2013 two days after the Rome meet on May [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[68],"class_list":["post-614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-diamond-league"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pa3DCY-9U","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=614"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":673,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/614\/revisions\/673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/trackchill.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}